Tag: Legal Workforce Trends

  • Procedure for Termination of an Employee

    Employee termination process: do you know how to conduct it? Is it easy to fire an employee that is dishonest and lazy? What are the reasons for employee termination process? What are the main types of employee termination? Do you know how to start an employee termination process? How to make sure that termination is valid and how to avoid lawsuits for wrongful termination? What are the crucial steps of employee termination processes? I know this are some of the questions that you may be having right now, and I'll help you get the answers by reading the blog.

    Many employers, particularly those in small and medium-sized businesses, treat employee termination as a quick, painful event to be gotten over with. They may rely on a brief, verbal conversation or a generic, unsigned email. This approach is a critical mistake. A proper termination process is a systematic, documented series of actions that begins long before the final meeting. It’s a legal safety net designed to protect your company from claims of wrongful termination, discrimination, or retaliation.

    This comprehensive guide will walk you through the proper procedure in terminating an employee. We will cover everything from the crucial documentation that must precede the final conversation to the essential components of a legally sound termination letter and the vital steps that must be taken after the employee has left. Our goal is to empower you to handle this process with confidence, ensuring you act with both legal integrity and professional dignity.


    Key Takeaways:

    1. Following a well-defined termination procedure is non-negotiable to protect your company from lawsuits, reputational damage, and low employee morale.

    2. The most critical step in the process is building a thorough paper trail with documents such as Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) and written warnings.

    3. The termination meeting should be a private, direct, and brief conversation with a pre-planned script, and you must avoid emotional debate.

    4. A formal termination letter is the most important document, as it confirms the conversation and details final pay, benefits, and the return of company property.

    5. Using platforms like Wansom can simplify the process by providing legally vetted document templates, ensuring a consistent approach and reducing risk.


    What is Employee Termination?

    At its simplest, employee termination is the formal separation of an individual from their employment. While the term can refer to a voluntary act, such as an employee's resignation, this guide focuses on involuntary termination—the decision by an employer to end the employment relationship. This is a legally significant action that must be handled with care. The reasons for termination are typically categorized into three main types:

    • For-Cause Termination: This is when an employee is terminated due to misconduct, such as insubordination, theft, or a serious violation of company policy. This type of termination often requires a swift and decisive response.

    • Performance-Based Termination: This occurs when an employee consistently fails to meet the expectations of their role, despite being given opportunities for improvement through performance management and formal warnings.

    • Business-Related Termination: This is a non-fault termination based on the needs of the business, such as downsizing, restructuring, or the elimination of a position due to economic conditions.

    Regardless of the reason, the process of terminating an employee must be handled with strict adherence to the law and your company’s internal policies to avoid legal and financial exposure.

    Why You Need an Employee Termination Process

    To fire somebody without risking further legal problems the manager has to be sure to have a valid, proven reason for such action. Firing can never be done on the spot, out of anger or for other personal reasons. Generally there are several reasons that can be documented and form acceptable set of reasons for termination of the employment.

    Among those reasons are:

    • physical violence: aggressive, abusive behavior towards other employees

    • criminal behavior: that may include either theft or revealing of company’s secrets

    • discrimination: harassment, sexual harassment

    • problems with timekeeping and attendance: absenteeism, tardiness

    • insubordination and breaking of company rules

    • lack of competence

    • low productivity.

    • poor quality of work, indolence

    Most of the reasons above directly influence the functioning of the company. Other reasons additionally put other employees at risk and they are important because of the health and safety regulations. If the behavior of your employee matches with one of the categories above you not only can, but you really should fire the employee without hesitation. You just have to remember that you cannot simply fire anybody as you see fit because you may have to prove your reasons later on – in court.


    What to do Before an Employee Termination Process

    Hiring, onboarding, and training a new employee can be a significant investment, but the costs associated with a legal challenge are even greater. Before initiating the employee termination process, it is paramount that all relevant information is meticulously recorded and organized. You should make a point to document every incident or communication that could pertain to the situation.

    Even informal conversations jotted down in a notebook can serve as powerful evidence of misconduct or a lack of commitment. In addition to these personal notes, you should compile other key forms of documentation, such as:

    • Examples of electronic communication (e.g., emails or instant messages)

    • Written records of phone conversations

    • Notes from one-on-one meetings

    • Formal written feedback from clients and team members

    • Official written complaints or allegations

    • Documents related to formal and criminal charges

    • Written performance reviews

    • Records of both written and verbal warnings

    Managers should begin documenting any unwanted behavior as soon as it occurs. While not all instances of misconduct lead directly to termination—some may only require other forms of disciplinary procedures or coaching—this documentation is a critical preparatory step. It is the only way to safeguard the company against potential wrongful termination lawsuits down the line.

    Finally, it is essential to be aware of the Equal Employment Opportunity regulations. Employers are legally prohibited from firing an employee for reasons related to their age, disability, national origin, race, color, religion, gender, or sexual identity. Any termination that can be proven to be connected to these factors is classified as discrimination and will likely result in a wrongful termination lawsuit.


    Steps of Employee Termination Processes

    Most companies already possess their own termination procedures that managers must follow. A well-managed employee termination process doesn’t have to be a tough experience; it simply requires a clear and organized approach. By following these steps, you can ensure the process is conducted with professionalism and legal integrity.

    Before the Meeting: The Pre-Termination Checklist

    The moment you decide to terminate an employee, you must have all your documents ready. Legal disputes and charges are far more costly than the investment in proper hiring and training. Therefore, before the meeting, you must:

    • Prepare Your Documentation: Gather and organize all relevant documents that justify the termination. This includes performance reviews, written and verbal warnings records, disciplinary notes, and formal complaints. Also, consider electronic communication like emails and instant messages that may serve as proof of misconduct.

    • Finalize the Termination Letter: Draft a clear and concise termination letter. This is a critical document that formalizes the decision and serves as a legal record.

    • Identify Business Property: Make a list of all company property that needs to be retrieved, such as laptops, keys, ID cards, and company phones. Having this list ready prevents oversight and potential security risks.

    • Verify Legal Compliance: Confirm that the termination is not related to any protected characteristics under the Equal Employment Opportunity regulations (age, disability, national origin, race, color, religion, gender, or sexual identity). Any termination proven to be discriminatory can lead to a wrongful termination lawsuit.

    During the Meeting: A Direct and Respectful Conversation

    The termination meeting itself should be a brief, private, and respectful encounter. Remember to:

    • Hold the Meeting in a Quiet Location: Conduct the conversation in a private, neutral space to ensure confidentiality and minimize embarrassment for the employee.

    • Prevent Interruptions: Make sure no one interrupts the meeting. This shows respect for the employee and prevents the conversation from being overheard.

    • Have Your Documents Ready: Bring the finalized termination letter to the meeting and be prepared to present it.

    • Be Direct and Empathetic: State the purpose of the meeting clearly and concisely. Avoid unnecessary small talk. Be respectful and listen to what your employee has to say, but do not engage in debate or argument.

    • Hold the Meeting at the End of the Day: Scheduling the meeting at the close of business allows the employee to leave discreetly without having to face their colleagues immediately afterward.

    After the Meeting: The Post-Termination Checklist

    Once the meeting is over, the process isn't finished. You must take immediate, essential steps to finalize the termination and protect the company.

    • Restrict Access: Immediately revoke the employee's access to all electronic devices, company networks, email, and physical locations. This is a crucial security measure.

    • Retrieve Business Property: Collect all company property as outlined in your pre-meeting checklist.

    • Conduct an Exit Interview (Optional): If appropriate, conducting an exit interview can provide valuable insights into why the employee is leaving, but only if they are willing to participate.

    • Allow Them to Clear Their Workspace: Offer to allow the employee to clear their personal belongings from their workspace outside of normal business hours. This shows consideration and professionalism.

    • Issue the Last Paycheck: Ensure the employee receives their final paycheck, along with any accrued vacation pay or benefits, in compliance with all local and state laws.

    • Handle Unemployment Benefits: Be prepared to handle any unemployment benefits claims, providing the necessary documentation to the relevant state agency.

    • Provide a Reference (with caution): Be prepared to provide references, but be cautious about what you say. It is often safest to confirm only the employee's title and dates of employment.

    • Thank the Employee: End the process by thanking the employee for their effort and contribution to the company.

    • Communicate with the Team: Inform other employees about the termination with a brief, professional message, without going into specific details.


    How Wansom Simplifies the Termination Process

    The complexities of employee termination can be overwhelming, but they don't have to be. Creating a professional and legally sound termination letter and other related documents is the most crucial step, but it is also the most intimidating. This is where Wansom provides a simple and secure solution.

    Instead of navigating the confusing and risky landscape of generic online forms or trying to draft a complex legal document from scratch, our platform offers a library of professionally crafted templates, including a comprehensive employment offer letter template and a full termination letter template. Our AI-powered legal assistant guides you through the process, ensuring all the essential clauses are included and the language is precise.

    Using Wansom means you can:

    • Ensure Legal Compliance: Our templates are regularly updated to reflect current labor laws and best practices, giving you peace of mind that your documents are sound.

    • Maintain Consistency: Our platform ensures you have a standardized and consistent approach for every employee separation, which is your best defense against claims of unfair treatment.

    • Reduce Risk: By using a legally vetted termination letter, you minimize the potential for costly lawsuits and protect your company's assets and reputation.

    • Focus on Business: The time and effort saved on legal drafting can be redirected to managing your team and growing your business, allowing you to focus on what you do best.


    Conclusion

    The decision to terminate an employee is never easy. But by following a proper, well-documented termination procedure, you can handle the situation with professionalism and integrity while protecting your company's interests. This process is a marathon, not a sprint, and every step, from the first performance note to the final offer letter for employment, matters.

    Don't let the fear of a legal misstep prevent you from making the right decision for your business. Leverage the power of Wansom's platform to ensure your employee termination process is compliant, consistent, and secure. Take control of the situation and give your business the protection it needs.

  • Will AI make lawyers lose their jobs or make them richer?

    New data reveals a stark divide emerging in the legal profession as artificial intelligence creates both unprecedented opportunities and existential threats

    Lawyers with AI skills now command a 56% salary premium—earning $203,500 compared to $129,900 for traditional practitioners—while overall legal employment continues to grow at 5.2% annually. The profession isn't facing extinction but evolution, with AI creating a new class of highly compensated tech-savvy attorneys while potentially eliminating entry-level positions.

    The Great Divide: Winners and Losers in the AI Revolution

    The legal profession stands at a crossroads that would make Charles Dickens proud: it is the best of times for some lawyers, the worst of times for others. Recent labor market data reveals an unprecedented wage gap opening between AI-skilled attorneys and their traditional counterparts, fundamentally reshaping who prospers in modern legal practice.

    Lawyers equipped with artificial intelligence capabilities are experiencing a financial renaissance. The median advertised salary for AI-skilled lawyers has reached $203,500, representing a staggering 56% premium over the $129,900 national average for all attorneys. This gap has accelerated dramatically from the 49% premium reported just two years ago, signaling an increasingly valuable and rare skill set.

    "AI is not just enhancing how lawyers work, it's redefining who gets hired, who does not, and how much they're worth," said Dustin Ruge, CEO of Law Leaders, reflecting on the seismic shifts reshaping legal careers.

    The Numbers Don't Lie: Employment vs. Enrichment

    Record Employment Despite AI Fears

    Contrary to widespread anxiety about robot lawyers replacing human attorneys, employment data tells a remarkably different story. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects legal employment will grow 5.2% through 2033—matching the average for all occupations. Even more striking, 82.2% of 2024 law school graduates secured positions requiring bar admission, representing a two-percentage-point increase from the previous year.

    Harvard Law's David Wilkins observes that global uncertainties and technological complexities are actually driving demand: "The good news—at least for lawyers!—is that all these issues will increase the demand for lawyers with the skills, expertise, and judgment to help clients across the public and private sectors navigate these complex problems."

    The Productivity Revolution

    The transformation isn't happening through job elimination but through radical productivity enhancement. In high-volume litigation, AI-powered systems have reduced associate time from 16 hours to 3-4 minutes for complaint responses—productivity gains exceeding 100-fold. Firms report capturing 30% more billable time through AI automation, while 65% of AI-using lawyers save between one and five hours weekly.

    This efficiency explosion creates a paradox: lawyers are simultaneously becoming more valuable and more efficient, leading to higher compensation rather than job losses.

    The Entry-Level Squeeze

    While overall employment remains robust, a concerning trend is emerging at the profession's entry point. Legal recruiters report that "entry-level positions are increasingly vanishing in firms that now rely on AI Co-Pilots and Agents to handle repetitive research and intake work."

    The impact is already visible in hiring patterns. Paul Weiss chair Brad Karp recently stated that junior lawyers will be "significantly replaced" by AI technology, while firms like Pierson Ferdinand LLP have replaced associate attorneys entirely with AI automation.

    Employment projections reflect this shift: while lawyer positions are expected to grow 5.2%, paralegal and legal assistant roles will expand only 1.2%—well below the national average. The traditional ladder of legal career progression is being reconfigured, with fewer rungs at the bottom.

    The Skills Premium: What Makes AI Lawyers Valuable

    Geographic and Sector Variations

    The AI skills premium varies significantly by location and legal sector. In the United States, the wage premium can reach 52%, while in the United Kingdom, it averages 45%. Legal professionals in artificial intelligence startups command even higher premiums, with average salaries of $205,000—86% above typical startup compensation.

    Corporate counsel positions requiring AI expertise offer annual salaries ranging from $145,000 to $175,000, with top positions at major companies reaching $289,000. Legal paraprofessionals specializing in AI can expect salaries between $60,000 and $85,000, compared to $40,000-$60,000 for their traditional counterparts.

    The Evolution of Legal Work

    AI is fundamentally changing what lawyers do rather than eliminating what they do. Instead of spending years on repetitive document review and research, junior lawyers can now focus on strategic capabilities, client interactions, case strategy, and business development.

    New hybrid roles are emerging that combine legal expertise with technical knowledge:

    • Legal Knowledge Engineers

      who structure legal information for machine consumption

    • Legal Process Designers

      who reimagine service delivery models

    • Legal Data Analysts

      who extract insights from legal data

    • AI Ethics Counsel

      who specialize in governance of automated systems

    The Firm-Level Reality Check

    No Mass Layoffs in Sight

    AmLaw100 firms interviewed for a Harvard Law School study reported no anticipated reduction in attorney headcount. Associate hiring and lateral movements remain unaffected by AI implementation. In fact, some firms are expanding headcount by adding new positions for data scientists and AI engineers.

    "With all of this smart software assisting the lawyers, none of the firms interviewed are anticipating any reduction in the need for the number of practicing attorneys," the Harvard study found.

    The billable hour model, despite predictions of its demise, continues to dominate 80% of fee arrangements. Rather than eliminating hours, AI is enabling lawyers to capture more billable time and focus on higher-value analysis and strategy.

    Strategic Positioning

    Leading firms are treating AI as a competitive differentiator rather than a cost-cutting tool. About one-third of major firms have developed practice methodologies that AI tools enhance, creating proprietary advantages in service delivery.

    The most successful implementations go beyond routine task automation to create entirely new capabilities. Forward-thinking litigation teams leverage AI-powered predictive analytics to analyze vast datasets of past cases, judges, and opposing counsel behaviors, providing empirical evidence that complements lawyer judgment.

    The Client Pressure Point

    Corporate clients are increasingly sophisticated about AI capabilities and expect law firms to share efficiency gains. Recent benchmarks show AI-enabled associates can draft NDAs 70% faster than their non-AI counterparts. When such gains are visible, clients demand to benefit from them.

    This client pressure is driving innovation in legal pricing models. Alternative fee arrangements are forecast to rise from 20% of law firm revenue in 2023 to over 70% by 2025, largely driven by AI-enabled efficiency gains.

    The Risk Assessment: What Could Go Wrong

    The Goldman Sachs Reality Check

    While early predictions suggested 44% of legal tasks could be automated, updated Goldman Sachs analysis indicates only 17% of legal jobs face AI displacement risk. A 2025 National Bureau of Economic Research study found AI chatbots had no statistically significant impact on hours worked or wages earned across professions, including law.

    The reality appears to be that AI serves as "a tireless but legally unqualified intern" requiring constant human oversight. The complexity of legal work and the profession's risk-averse culture provide natural barriers to wholesale automation.

    Implementation Challenges

    The gap between AI expectations and reality remains significant. Bloomberg Law's 2025 survey found that while 39% of attorneys expected AI to accelerate alternative fee arrangements, only 9% reported actual increases in AFA adoption.

    Firms face substantial implementation challenges: transitioning from legacy systems, establishing security credentials, setting up training programs, and managing integration complexities. These practical hurdles are slowing AI adoption and tempering its immediate impact.

    Looking Forward: The Two-Track Profession

    The Winning Formula

    The lawyers positioned to thrive in the AI era share common characteristics:

    • Early AI adoption

      to command immediate salary premiums

    • Focus on high-value work

      requiring human judgment and creativity

    • Client relationship expertise

      that AI cannot replicate

    • Strategic thinking capabilities

      that complement AI efficiency

    • Continuous learning mindset

      to adapt to evolving technologies

    The Education Imperative

    Law schools are beginning to adapt, with forward-thinking institutions offering courses in legal technology, process design, and data analysis alongside traditional doctrinal education. However, the pace of change demands that practicing lawyers take ownership of their professional development.

    As one legal innovation expert noted: "Law schools are beginning to adapt, but the real education is happening in firms that are willing to invest in training their people to work alongside AI systems."

    The Verdict: Enrichment Through Evolution

    The evidence overwhelmingly supports a narrative of professional evolution rather than extinction. AI is creating a bifurcated legal profession where adaptation determines prosperity. The lawyers who embrace AI technology early, develop complementary skills, and focus on high-value client service are experiencing unprecedented compensation growth.

    Meanwhile, the profession overall continues to expand, driven by increasing regulatory complexity, global uncertainties, and the need for human judgment in an increasingly automated world. The key insight is that AI doesn't replace lawyers—it replaces tasks, freeing attorneys to focus on work that requires uniquely human capabilities.

    Harvard's David Wilkins captures the opportunity: "We are seeing a world of increased risk, instability, and uncertainty, but also one with new and exciting opportunities for lawyers." The question isn't whether lawyers will survive the AI revolution, but whether they'll position themselves to profit from it.

    The legal profession's future belongs to those who view AI not as a threat to be feared but as a tool to be mastered. In this transformation, the winners won't be determined by their ability to compete with machines, but by their capacity to collaborate with them.

  • Why law firms are Racing to Hire Data Scientists and Software Engineers

    Why law firms are Racing to Hire Data Scientists and Software Engineers

    As AI reshapes legal services, top law firms are abandoning the "buy vs. build" debate and recruiting elite technology talent to create competitive advantages from within

    Major law firms have launched an unprecedented hiring spree for data scientists and software engineers, with Latham & Watkins, Cleary Gottlieb, DLA Piper, and Reed Smith creating new technology roles in recent months. This shift from buying legal tech to building it internally represents a fundamental reimagining of how elite firms compete in an AI-driven marketplace where technological superiority increasingly determines market position.

    The Acquisition That Changed Everything

    When Cleary Gottlieb acquired Springbok AI earlier this year, it wasn't just another tech purchase—it was a declaration of war on the traditional vendor model. The transaction brought ten data scientists into Cleary's fold, marking a dramatic departure from the decades-old practice of outsourcing technology development to third-party vendors.

    AI in law is big business. That transaction brought ten data scientists into Cleary's fold and marked a departure from outsourcing everything according to a Reuters report and a report in the Financial Times. The message was clear: law firms are no longer content to be passive consumers of legal technology—they want to be its creators.

    The War for AI Talent

    Global firms have spent the first half of the year stocking up on data scientists and machine learning engineers. Many law firm technology leaders say the vendor market has fallen short of their firms' needs. The numbers tell a compelling story of systematic investment in technical talent across BigLaw.

    The Hiring Surge by the Numbers:

    • Latham & Watkins, Cleary Gottlieb, DLA Piper, and Reed Smith have all hired technology specialists to newly created roles in the last month alone

    • Morgan, Lewis & Bockius is actively recruiting directors of AI and innovation

    • Across London large firms like Freshfields, Linklaters and Slaughter and May are already recruiting for data science roles

    • Over 49,000 law-related data science jobs are currently available in the United States

    This isn't just about filling IT support roles. These firms are recruiting PhD-level data scientists, machine learning engineers, and software architects—the same talent pool that tech giants like Google, Meta, and OpenAI compete for aggressively.

    Why Now? The Competitive Imperative

    The timing of this talent acquisition reflects several converging pressures that make in-house tech development not just attractive, but essential for survival.

    Client Pressure for Innovation

    Law firms often debate growth objectives when drafting strategic plans, and for a long time the advantages of scale were not apparent in the legal industry. Often law firm strategy would avoid a path of "growth for growth's sake." However, recent aggressive hiring in the lateral partner markets from firms with very deep financial pockets have demonstrated how significant an advantage scale is.

    Clients are no longer willing to pay premium rates for work that can be automated. They're demanding transparency about AI usage and expecting efficiency gains to translate into cost savings. Major law firms are choosing to invest heavily in legal technology to improve efficiency, streamline processes, and meet growing client expectations.

    Vendor Market Limitations

    Many law firm technology leaders say the vendor market has fallen short of their firms' needs. Firms' top brass recognizes the inevitability of widespread AI adoption and disruption and seeks expertise from the tech community. Off-the-shelf solutions simply can't address the specific workflows, security requirements, and competitive needs of elite legal practices.

    The Scale Advantage

    Similarly, the transition to AI capable law firms also advantages those firms with the financial strength to make these investments without risking partner well-being (profits). As one lawyer stated, "We are making huge investments…it's not just the money but the time it takes to evaluate new AI products and the jettison the ones that are not useful."

    Only the largest, most profitable firms can afford to build internal technology teams. This creates a powerful competitive moat that threatens to leave smaller firms permanently disadvantaged.

    What These Teams Actually Do

    The data scientists and engineers being hired aren't working on generic productivity tools. They're developing highly specialized applications that leverage each firm's unique data, workflows, and competitive positioning.

    Custom AI Model Development

    These teams build proprietary large language models trained on firm-specific data. While ChatGPT might help with general legal research, a custom model trained on decades of a firm's successful briefs, contracts, and case strategies provides exponentially more value.

    Predictive Analytics for Legal Strategy

    Forward-thinking litigation teams are leveraging AI-powered predictive analytics to transform strategy by analyzing vast datasets of past cases, judges, and opposing counsel behaviors. These systems don't make strategy decisions. Instead, they provide empirical evidence that complements lawyer judgment.

    Workflow Automation and Integration

    The report also reveals that disconnected tools significantly impact non-billable time. Entering data in multiple systems (40%) was most frequently reported as the non-billable task that law firm professionals spend the most time on. Internal teams solve this by building integrated platforms that eliminate data entry redundancy and create seamless workflows.

    Competitive Intelligence Systems

    Data scientists are building systems that analyze market trends, competitor strategies, and client behavior patterns to identify new business opportunities and optimize pricing strategies.

    The Skills Premium: What Firms Are Paying

    The competition for top tech talent is driving compensation to unprecedented levels. According to research for the Demand for Skilled Talent report, the most evident skills gap on technology teams is within AI, machine learning and data science. AI expertise has become increasingly valuable as organizations seek professionals who can develop and implement solutions.

    Salary Ranges for Legal Tech Roles:

    • Data Scientists: $120,000 – $195,000+ base salary

    • AI/Machine Learning Engineers: $150,000 – $250,000+

    • Senior Technology Architects: $200,000 – $350,000+

    But money isn't the only draw. Technology hiring trends in 2025 indicate that candidates place a high value on exposure to AI and machine learning projects, as these skills significantly enhance their career trajectories. Law firms offer these professionals the opportunity to work on cutting-edge applications with real-world impact.

    The Build vs. Buy Revolution

    The traditional legal tech market operated on a simple premise: vendors build generic solutions, and law firms adapt their processes to fit the software. This model is collapsing as firms realize that competitive advantage comes from technology that reflects their unique strengths.

    Douwe Groenevelt, formerly head of legal at ASML and now running AI consultancy Viridea, says embedding AI creates competitive distinction. When every firm uses the same commercial software, no one has an advantage. When firms build proprietary tools, they can create sustainable competitive moats.

    Investment Beyond Hiring

    Firms aren't just hiring individual contributors—they're building entire technology departments:

    • Wilson Sonsini backed SingleFile Technologies Inc., a compliance filing software provider. Orrick has invested in DraftWise, Priori Legal, and AltaClaro, looking for tools that align with the firm's data security and AI principles

    • A&O Shearman, Cooley, and Orrick are leading the charge in legal tech investment and development

    • Many firms are creating Chief Technology Officer and Chief Innovation Officer positions

    Skills-Based Hiring Revolution

    This tech talent acquisition is part of a broader shift toward skills-based hiring across BigLaw. Firms are increasingly prioritizing skills-based hiring, valuing practical abilities like legal tech proficiency, project management, and client communication over traditional markers of success.

    According to a 2024 report by the National Association for Law Placement (NALP), 55% of Am Law 200 firms now use skills-based assessments during the recruiting process, up from just 30% in 2020. This trend extends beyond lawyers to encompass the entire professional services ecosystem.

    The Talent Bridge Challenge

    One of the biggest challenges firms face is bridging the gap between legal and technical expertise. To bridge the language barrier between lawyers and technologists, global firms have spent the first half of the year stocking up on data scientists and machine learning engineers, often with legal backgrounds.

    The most valuable hires are those who understand both domains:

    • Former lawyers who transitioned to data science

    • Computer scientists with law degrees

    • Product managers from legal tech companies

    • Engineers with experience in regulatory compliance

    Impact on Traditional Legal Careers

    This shift raises important questions about the future of legal careers. Expect firms to hire fewer associates where AI engineering can handle repeatable work but make no mistake: young lawyers will still be needed. Their skills must evolve. Understanding large language models and how they work matters far more than knowing how to code them from scratch.

    Law schools are beginning to respond. The rise of AI and data privacy law is prompting law schools to integrate specialized courses on emerging technologies. Tomorrow's lawyers will need to be as comfortable with algorithms as they are with precedents.

    The Competitive Landscape Transformation

    The firms investing most heavily in technology talent are creating sustainable competitive advantages that will be difficult for competitors to match. The magnitude of investment required will be difficult for many mid-sized firms, and it illuminates the competitive threat.

    This creates a bifurcated market:

    • Technology Leaders:

      Firms with internal tech teams that can build custom solutions, integrate complex workflows, and offer truly differentiated services

    • Technology Followers:

      Firms dependent on vendor solutions that offer limited differentiation and increasing commoditization

    The Client Value Proposition

    Ultimately, this massive investment in technical talent serves client needs. A notable 88% of law firm professionals agree that technology can improve client relationships. When asked about past technology investments, improving team and client collaboration (38%) and producing consistent quality work (37%) were most frequently cited as motivators for firms to invest in technology in the past year.

    Clients increasingly expect:

    • Faster turnaround times through automation

    • More accurate work through AI-assisted review

    • Transparent pricing based on value rather than time

    • Access to sophisticated analytics and reporting

    • Integration with their own technology systems

    Looking Ahead: The New Law Firm Operating Model

    Alex Brown of Simmons predicts more deals like the Springbok and Wavelength ones. Demand for talent with both AI and data science skills is high and competition will be intense. Growth of in-house data science capacity gives firms an edge.

    The law firms of 2030 will look dramatically different from today's partnerships. They will be hybrid organizations that combine legal expertise with sophisticated technology capabilities, competing as much on their technical infrastructure as their legal skills.

    Key Predictions:

    • More law firms will acquire tech startups to gain talent and intellectual property

    • Chief Technology Officer roles will become standard at AmLaw 100 firms

    • Technology capability will become a primary factor in client selection

    • Firms without internal tech teams will face increasing marginalization

    Strategic Implications for the Legal Industry

    The great tech talent grab represents more than just another hiring trend—it's a fundamental reimagining of what law firms need to be successful. With advances in technology deployment, financial scale, and management discipline, second tier firms will likely face a significant threat in an extremely competitive marketplace.

    For law firm leaders, the message is clear: building internal technology capability isn't just about efficiency—it's about survival. The firms that successfully combine legal expertise with technical innovation will define the future of legal services. Those that don't risk becoming expensive anachronisms in an AI-driven world.

    The race for tech talent in BigLaw isn't just changing how legal services are delivered—it's determining which firms will lead the profession into its next chapter. And in this race, the fastest often win it all.

  • The True Cost of AI for Law Firms: What You Need to Know Before You Invest

    The True Cost of AI for Law Firms: What You Need to Know Before You Invest

    Beyond the Software: Hidden Costs of AI Integration

    Many firms focus solely on software licensing, but the true cost of AI integration extends far beyond that.

    1. Infrastructure Readiness: Building Your AI Foundation

    Before your firm can effectively leverage AI, you need a robust technological foundation. This includes:

    • Data Preparation:

      AI thrives on data. You'll need to dedicate resources to cleaning, organizing, and digitizing your firm's existing data.

    • Robust VPN & Security:

      Secure access to AI tools is paramount, especially when dealing with sensitive legal information. Ensure end-to-end encryption for all legal communications.

    • Cloud Compatibility:

      Assess where your data is stored for compliance and ensure secure migration of on-premise systems to the cloud if necessary.

    • Integration with Core Systems:

      Your chosen AI tool must seamlessly integrate with existing systems like Office365 and Document Management Systems to avoid workflow disruptions.

    2. Training & Change Management: Empowering Your Team

    Technology is only as good as the people using it. Investing in your team is a critical, often overlooked, cost.

    • Comprehensive Training:

      All staff, from paralegals to partners, need comprehensive training on how to effectively utilize AI tools.

    • Change Management:

      Overcoming resistance to new technologies and fostering a culture of adoption is vital for successful AI implementation.

    3. Software Licensing & Customization: Understanding Your Options

    Software costs can vary significantly based on your deployment model.

    • Subscription Fees (SaaS):

      Cloud-based AI solutions often come with monthly subscription fees, averaging around $29 per user per month.

    • On-Premise Deployment: If you choose to host the AI software on your firm's servers, be prepared for additional costs:

      • Hardware:

        This includes powerful servers, GPUs, and robust storage.

      • Software Licenses:

        One-time purchase licenses for the core AI platform.

      • IT Infrastructure:

        Networking, cooling, and the personnel required to manage it all.

      • Costs for on-premise deployment can start from around $12,000.

    • Model Fine-Tuning & Customization:

      For firms wanting to train an AI model on their specific data, costs can start from $8,000, depending on your needs and data volume.

    The ROI: Why AI is a Smart Investment for Law Firms

    While the initial investment in AI can seem substantial, the return on investment (ROI) and strategic benefits for law firms are compelling.

    Metric

    Before AI

    After AI

    Impact & Benefit

    Document Review Time

    Weeks to Months (for large litigations)

    Days to Weeks (up to 50-80% faster)

    Faster case preparation, reduced billable hours, client satisfaction.

    Legal Research Efficiency

    Hours to Days (manual search & analysis)

    Minutes to Hours (AI-powered insights)

    Quicker identification of relevant precedents, stronger arguments.

    Contract Review Accuracy

    ~70-85% (human error prone)

    ~95%+ (AI identifies nuances & discrepancies)

    Reduced risk of errors, stronger contractual positions.

    Billable Hours Allocated to Routine Tasks

    20-30% of junior associate time

    <10% (AI handles data entry, initial drafts)

    Free up highly skilled staff for higher-value, complex work.

    Client Intake Process

    1-2 hours (manual data collection & conflict checks)

    15-30 minutes (AI automates checks & data entry)

    Faster onboarding, improved client experience, higher capacity.

    By understanding both the costs and the significant benefits, law firms can make informed decisions about integrating AI, ultimately leading to greater efficiency, accuracy, and client satisfaction.

    Looking for a private and secure legal AI workspace? Learn more at Wansom.ai.